The Saudi Ambassador: Sudan Backs the Kingdom Courageously - Rawan For Media Artistic and Production
Many
other countries, including the Sudan, followed suit. That is to
say, they also cut off diplomatic bonds with Iran. The Sudanese Foreign
Affairs Ministry called on the Iranian Charge d’ affaires to inform
him that the government of Sudan had decided to close down the Iranian
Embassy and that the Iranian mission there was to quit the country
within a period not exceeding two weeks, from the date of order
issuance.
This
decision on part of the Sudan received an overwhelming support from
various many quarters, esp. locally. To begin with, there is the Saudi
Ambassador to Sudan, Faisal bin Hamid Ma’ala who affirmed that what
Iran did could be considered as sheer violation to all diplomatic
protocols, welcoming the courageous backing of Sudan to the Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia, affirming that such a thing conformed with its recent
positions in the ‘Decisive Storm’ in Yemen and the ‘Islamic Alliance’
against terrorism.
In
line, the Independent Mohammedan Sunna Disciples Groups (IMSDG) showed
approval of severing of diplomatic ties with Iran and adherence of
Sudan’s government with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Rajab Fadl Mohamed, a prominent cadre of MSDG, described the decision
as very supportive to Islamic nation’s doctrine, explaining that Iran
was working feverishly to undermine the Islamic nation entity, citing
Yemen, Iraq and Syria as the good example to illustrate this, calling
on the Islamic nations to back the stance of the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia in this domain. .
Sudan’s
parliamentarians are not an isolated island from this. MP Ali Al
Hassan indicated that the decision to sever relations with Iran
complied with the Sudanese public welfare, going to label it as so
logical and rational.
MP
Al Amin Daffalla called on all nations that aspired for stability in
the region to adopt similar measures, noticing that now Iran had been
insulting Islamic doctrines.
Moreover,
Ali Al Sayid of the Democratic Unionist Party ( the origin) stressed
that Sudan should side with the Saudi Arabia, noting that it should
not be neutral in a situation as such, expecting that relations between
the two countries would mushroom tremendously and in many fields, esp.
economically.
Similarly,
Dr. Safwat Fanus, lecturer of international relations in many
universities, said that now Sudan had been faced by security threats
that made it imperative for the leadership of the country to search for a
regional backer supporting its side in the problems it was in, going on
as praising Sudan’s decision, since it was already a member of the
‘Islamic Alliance’ and the ‘Decisive Windstorm’.
He
added that Iran was perceived as having hegemonic tendencies, since it
was constantly engaging in dividing the Islamic world on Shiite and
Sunni basis so as to let them continue fighting each others.
Mohamed
Abul Qadir, also a columnist, argued that severing of diplomatic ties
with Iran adhered strongly with the public temperament of the majority
of Sudanese, noticing that such a thing fulfilled old demands of the
opposition that Sudan should immediately distance itself from Iran.
In
the opinion of Kamal Hassan Bakheet, writer, all were to be surged to
keep prepared and cautious regarding the sleeping cells, esp. those who
happened to be recruited and trained by the Iranian Embassy in Khartoum,
calling on the newly formed ‘Islamic Alliance’ to be much vigilant
concerning the Iranian plots and conspiracies against all the peaceful
Arab and Islamic nations , concluding that they wanted to enjoy
genuine relations with the two people of Sudan and Iran.
In
conclusion, there is Diaa Al Din Bilal, a journalist, who showed that
Iran’s involvement in independent countries such as Iraq, and Syria was
no longer a top secret, disclosing that it was even noticed as to
publicly bragging that it did it and may even keep behaving in a similar
way.
By Ahmed Ibrahim Ballal, 15 hours 19 minutes ago
Now
relations between Iran and Arab and Islamic countries have reached
worst levels. Execution of the Shiite, Nimir Al Nimir, by the Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia ignited angry reactions on part of many Iranians who
physically engaged into assaults on the Saudi embassy’s headquarters
in Tehran and the Saudi consulate in the Mashhad town. Because of this,
the Saudi Arabia immediately severed its relations with Iran.
relations between Iran and Arab and Islamic countries have reached
worst levels. Execution of the Shiite, Nimir Al Nimir, by the Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia ignited angry reactions on part of many Iranians who
physically engaged into assaults on the Saudi embassy’s headquarters
in Tehran and the Saudi consulate in the Mashhad town. Because of this,
the Saudi Arabia immediately severed its relations with Iran.
Many
other countries, including the Sudan, followed suit. That is to
say, they also cut off diplomatic bonds with Iran. The Sudanese Foreign
Affairs Ministry called on the Iranian Charge d’ affaires to inform
him that the government of Sudan had decided to close down the Iranian
Embassy and that the Iranian mission there was to quit the country
within a period not exceeding two weeks, from the date of order
issuance.
This
decision on part of the Sudan received an overwhelming support from
various many quarters, esp. locally. To begin with, there is the Saudi
Ambassador to Sudan, Faisal bin Hamid Ma’ala who affirmed that what
Iran did could be considered as sheer violation to all diplomatic
protocols, welcoming the courageous backing of Sudan to the Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia, affirming that such a thing conformed with its recent
positions in the ‘Decisive Storm’ in Yemen and the ‘Islamic Alliance’
against terrorism.
In
line, the Independent Mohammedan Sunna Disciples Groups (IMSDG) showed
approval of severing of diplomatic ties with Iran and adherence of
Sudan’s government with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Rajab Fadl Mohamed, a prominent cadre of MSDG, described the decision
as very supportive to Islamic nation’s doctrine, explaining that Iran
was working feverishly to undermine the Islamic nation entity, citing
Yemen, Iraq and Syria as the good example to illustrate this, calling
on the Islamic nations to back the stance of the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia in this domain. .
Sudan’s
parliamentarians are not an isolated island from this. MP Ali Al
Hassan indicated that the decision to sever relations with Iran
complied with the Sudanese public welfare, going to label it as so
logical and rational.
MP
Al Amin Daffalla called on all nations that aspired for stability in
the region to adopt similar measures, noticing that now Iran had been
insulting Islamic doctrines.
Moreover,
Ali Al Sayid of the Democratic Unionist Party ( the origin) stressed
that Sudan should side with the Saudi Arabia, noting that it should
not be neutral in a situation as such, expecting that relations between
the two countries would mushroom tremendously and in many fields, esp.
economically.
Similarly,
Dr. Safwat Fanus, lecturer of international relations in many
universities, said that now Sudan had been faced by security threats
that made it imperative for the leadership of the country to search for a
regional backer supporting its side in the problems it was in, going on
as praising Sudan’s decision, since it was already a member of the
‘Islamic Alliance’ and the ‘Decisive Windstorm’.
There
are also other contributors on this subject matter. For one thing,
there is Rashid Abdul Rahim, a columnist, who said that past relations
with Iran were even so catastrophic as they were portraying Sudan as a
sponsor of terrorism, hence a real threat to its neighbors and Arab
nations, esp. the gulf ones.
are also other contributors on this subject matter. For one thing,
there is Rashid Abdul Rahim, a columnist, who said that past relations
with Iran were even so catastrophic as they were portraying Sudan as a
sponsor of terrorism, hence a real threat to its neighbors and Arab
nations, esp. the gulf ones.
He
added that Iran was perceived as having hegemonic tendencies, since it
was constantly engaging in dividing the Islamic world on Shiite and
Sunni basis so as to let them continue fighting each others.
Mohamed
Abul Qadir, also a columnist, argued that severing of diplomatic ties
with Iran adhered strongly with the public temperament of the majority
of Sudanese, noticing that such a thing fulfilled old demands of the
opposition that Sudan should immediately distance itself from Iran.
In
the opinion of Kamal Hassan Bakheet, writer, all were to be surged to
keep prepared and cautious regarding the sleeping cells, esp. those who
happened to be recruited and trained by the Iranian Embassy in Khartoum,
calling on the newly formed ‘Islamic Alliance’ to be much vigilant
concerning the Iranian plots and conspiracies against all the peaceful
Arab and Islamic nations , concluding that they wanted to enjoy
genuine relations with the two people of Sudan and Iran.
In
conclusion, there is Diaa Al Din Bilal, a journalist, who showed that
Iran’s involvement in independent countries such as Iraq, and Syria was
no longer a top secret, disclosing that it was even noticed as to
publicly bragging that it did it and may even keep behaving in a similar
way.
By Ahmed Ibrahim Ballal, 15 hours 19 minutes ago
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق